4
Min Read
Machine learning (ML) model monitoring is essential to ensure your models function properly. Without consistent monitoring, your models will degrade and become less accurate over time. How can you avoid significant degradation? model monitoring best practices suggest you frequently check the precision of your model to identify when problems occur before they have negative impacts. Let’s explore ML model monitoring and degradation.
ML monitoring is used to gauge critical model performance indicators and identify when problems occur. Monitoring involves observing any changes in your ML models, such as model degradation or data drift, and making sure that your model is still performing as intended. Model monitoring helps your MLOps team find and fix a wide range of problems, such as inaccurate predictions and subpar technical performance.
Basically, the purpose of continuously checking your models is to:
Lack of effective model monitoring throughout a model’s life cycle comes with significant risks. Since testing for every scenario a model may encounter is impossible, constant oversight is essential to ensure the model continues to perform as intended. Many machine learning models are deployed without sufficient testing or monitoring, increasing the likelihood of negative impacts, such as inaccurate predictions or degraded performance.
Once a model is deployed, its predictive performance often declines almost immediately. This is due to the dynamic nature of machine learning environments, where data inputs and contextual variables evolve. Although models are optimized based on the most recent data available during training, this data loses relevance as conditions change. Consequently, models built on outdated information may produce predictions that are inaccurate or biased, leading to potentially harmful consequences. This underscores the importance of continuous evaluation using model monitoring tools, such as Fiddler AI to track performance and prevent degradation.
Model monitoring tools provide actionable insights by identifying key issues such as data drift, model drift, and other discrepancies in performance metrics. These tools help teams understand how to check and monitor models by offering visibility into critical aspects of the model’s functionality. They also make it easier to monitor model performance in real time, ensuring timely interventions when performance metrics deviate from expected benchmarks. Without dedicated monitoring as part of the MLOps lifecycle, ML teams cannot effectively detect or address these issues, risking further degradation of the model’s predictive capabilities.
Model degradation occurs when a machine learning model’s performance declines after deployment, leading to inaccurate predictions compared to its training phase. It is a common misconception that deploying a trained model marks the end of its development. Over time, an ML model predictive’s ability diminishes as the data they encounter diverges from the data they were trained on. This phenomenon is a primary example of AI model degradation and highlights why machine learning models degrade in production environments.
Simply put, once your model is deployed, it’s at risk of inaccurately predicting results compared to training. It is misleading to assume the deployment of a trained model means the end of ML development. Machine learning models are frequently created to consume future unknown data. As a model is tested on current datasets in quickly changing contexts, the model’s predictive ability inevitably declines. This change in accuracy leads to model degradation of machine learning solutions.
The process of latent performance decreasing is known as model drift. Model drift describes how the relationship between input and output data changes over time in unexpected ways. Because of the changes, the end-user interprets the model predictions for the same or comparable data as having degraded. Model drift essentially refers to a shift in the underlying and overlooked connection between input and output variables.
One key driver of model degradation is model drift, a gradual shift in the relationship between input and output data. This phenomenon often arises in unpredictable ways as real-world conditions evolve. For example, a model trained on historical data might struggle to adapt to new patterns, leading to a decline in predictive accuracy. Over time, this can result in data degradation, where the quality and relevance of the input data no longer align with the model’s assumptions, further diminishing its effectiveness.
The impact of AI degradation on machine learning performance is profound. As the model's underlying assumptions become outdated, its predictions become less reliable, often leading to poor decision-making, resource inefficiencies, and negative outcomes in critical applications. These issues can accumulate without proactive monitoring, rendering the model ineffective in production environments.
To combat these challenges, organizations must implement robust monitoring and maintenance strategies. By continuously evaluating performance and addressing data and model drift, teams can ensure their models remain accurate, relevant, and capable of delivering value in dynamic production settings.
As new data is collected, it is crucial to monitor how your model performs after deployment and compare any changes to its performance during training. A noticeable decline in performance, such as model drift, clearly indicates that it’s time to retrain the model. However, modern machine learning model training is resource-intensive, and updating a pre-trained and tested model can require significant time and effort.
Regularly evaluate key machine learning performance indicators to ensure your model continues to perform as intended. Using ML model monitoring tools is one of the most effective ways to track performance and identify potential degradation. For example, the robust Fiddler AI Observability platform is equipped with enterprise-grade model monitoring tools. These tools provide ongoing visibility into training and production environments, enabling teams to quickly respond to actionable insights, optimize models, and better understand why predictions are made.